15/9/2016

GWCT response to State of Nature 2016

By Jim Egan, Head of Development and Training for the Allerton Project

Blackbird (www.lauriecampbell.com)At the GWCT Allerton Project, we are continually looking at solutions to integrate agricultural and environmental objectives that are scientifically sound and practically grounded. This needs to be achieved without our farmers experiencing lower production levels and also retaining profitability.

For more than 20 years, we’ve been able to demonstrate solutions on a practical working farm level. For example, we have established that it is possible to reverse the decline in farmland birds. Songbird numbers have changed considerably in response to game management at the Allerton Project. Following seven years of management for wild game, we saw songbird numbers doubling, and they are now 90% higher than they were in 1992.

We have seen a growing range of issues, including increases in predation. Our research suggests that predation can be a common limiting factor for breeding success for many species in the UK. Effective predator control can raise species’ local abundance to levels higher than in the absence of predator control, resulting in improved conservation status given suitable habitat.

In addition, we understand the measures that need to be put in place for successful farming practices and how best to engage with farmers. We all need to recognise the issues that farmers face, and we need to engage them properly to help them provide the solutions. We have an opportunity post-Brexit to create new regulations that will reduce the red tape and give farmers the support they need to make the changes that will benefit the countryside; this will need to be a sensible mix of regulation and incentive.

The Farmer Cluster concept, developed by the GWCT in association with Natural England, is a way to bring together a number of farmers in their locality, enabling them to collectively deliver greater benefits for soil, water and wildlife at a landscape or catchment scale. Farmers can have an enormously positive impact on the rural environment, but there is only so much that an individual, acting in isolation, can do on his or her own farm. We have the solutions we need to be able to work collectively to deliver them.

Visitors at Loddington on Open Farm SundayAs well as working with farmers, we firmly believe in the education of the next generation. At the Allerton Project we host over 300 school children every year, demonstrating to them the best practices for farming and management of the land. Engaging them so they understand what is done on farms to produce both food and a healthy environment.

Finally, involving volunteers in projects that further their understanding is crucial. Every year the GWCT invites farmers to participate in the Big Farmland Bird Count. This important initiative offers a simple means of recording the effect of any conservation schemes currently being initiated by farmers and gamekeepers on their land, such as supplementary feeding or growing wild bird seed crops and game cover crops. We understand the role that farmers and gamekeepers play in the survival of farmland birds and we want to give them an opportunity to show what their conservation efforts deliver on the ground.

The Allerton Project has nearly 25 years of applied science and practical farming experience. We recognise the issues raised in the State of Nature Report and we firmly believe that the solution lies in helping farmers to deliver a better environment alongside profitable businesses. We shouldn’t forget that there is a considerable amount of good work already being done, and we need to help farmers build on this.

Photo credit (top): Laurie Campbell

Free GWCT NewsletterFree weekly newsletter

Stay updated and get all the latest GWCT blog updates and news delivered straight to your inbox each week.

Sign up FREE to the Weekly GWCT Newsletter >

 

 

Comments

article by Simon Barnes re National trust

at 17:15 on 20/09/2016 by Joan Burnett

Simon Barnes supports the purchase of land without the farmstead in the Lake District. He thinks the area is overgrazed and this has all sorts of bad consequences. This could be addressed if payment was based on acreage rather than headage. I also think the word subsidy gives the wrong impression. People who work for Natural England are paid for the work they do, often incompetently, but that is described as a salary not a subsidy. Let us not demonise farmers.

Make a comment

Cookie Policy

Our website uses cookies to provide you with a better online experience. If you continue to use our site without changing your browser settings, we'll assume you are happy to receive cookies. Please read our cookie policy for more information.

Do not show this message again