24/9/2018

Packham might also want to appoint a minister for the Truthful Representation of Science: Our letter to the Guardian

Two -woodcock 600

When Chris Packham writes his next manifesto for wildlife he might also appoint a minister for the Truthful Representation of Science. This will neatly avoid any suggestion that the existing evidence is being manipulated or misinterpreted to fit his policies. If he wishes to claim his manifesto is based on sound science he must then review all the available evidence rather than seek out papers that support his personal opinion.

Unfortunately he did not, so many of the claims made about woodcock, pheasants, heather burning, red grouse, mountain hares and farming, for example, bear only a passing resemblance to the available evidence. Our wildlife deserves better than this and our offer to take him through any of the 1,193 scientific papers we have published remains open.

Andrew Gilruth
GWCT Director of Communications

Help us create a thriving countryside rich in game and other wildlife

What do we do?

  • We use science to promote game and wildlife management as an essential part of nature conservation.
  • We develop scientifically researched game and wildlife management techniques.
  • We promote our work to conservationists, including farmers and landowners and offer an on-site advisory service on all aspects of game and wildlife management, so that Britain’s countryside and its wildlife are enhanced for the public benefit.
  • We influence government policy with sound science that creates progressive and effective policies.
  • We support best practice for field sports that contribute to improving the biodiversity of the countryside.

Untitled -1.fw

What do we believe?

  • Scientific research should underpin sustainable conservation practice.
  • Game and wildlife management is the foundation of good conservation.
  • Field sports (in particular shooting and fishing) can contribute substantially to the conservation of landscape, habitat and wildlife.
  • Humane and targeted predator control is an essential part of effective game and wildlife conservation.
  • We utterly oppose those who engage in wildlife crime.
  • Good conservation goes hand-in-hand with economic land use.

How your money is spent

  • We spent over £5m on vital game and wildlife research and public education in 2017.

Donate by Credit or Debit Card >

or
Paypalcheckout .fw

Comments

Chris Packham

at 16:44 on 01/11/2018 by S Martin

Chris Packham was studying the wildlife in his own garden this spring/summer and was distressed to find none. Hmmm. Perhaps he should take a GWCT course and learn how to manage his land better instead of distancing himself from the very people encouraging and protecting wildlife.

Countryside debate

at 20:28 on 26/09/2018 by Joanna Dakin

Do you think the BBC might be interested in screening a debate between the likes of Packham and GWCT experts - visiting sites that each believes proves their point? Would make most interesting television.

PACKHAM

at 10:36 on 26/09/2018 by Tony DW

Good response from GWCT, as always well reasoned and balanced. The BBC need to account for their policy of allowing the propaganda spouted by Packham; half truths and not so subtle innuendo. How can they justify such a biased approach?

Packham Boycott

at 19:16 on 25/09/2018 by Wesley Walker

If Packham appears in it I switch it off. Boycott Packham programs and hopefully the BBC will drop him.

Chris Packham’s manifesto for wildlife

at 18:39 on 25/09/2018 by Piers Fenwick

Sadly many entrenched views have been expressed by both sides no doubt with biased computer algorithms reinforcing . We should take time to listen and read each other’s observations scientifically as there is work to be done in restoring our countryside to health. It’s better to improve natural habitats, restore the soil ,aquatics, vegetation, bug-life, birds and mammals to a realistic balance. The public still sees shooting in the countryside as an imposition of alien birds in vast numbers for the benefit of the few. They still do not recognise the benefits for wildlife of well observed local knowledge and careful management undertaken by well run shoots.

Packam

at 17:25 on 25/09/2018 by Malcolm Hibbard

Packam should keep is mouth shut he has not got a clue what he is talking about

Beckham's mistruths

at 17:22 on 25/09/2018 by Cornish hedgehopper

Excellent response, week done. You need to shout it at the general membership of RSPB/National Trust/BBC viewers (though credit where due,they have done some good stuff recently , regards deer stalking and the Sandringham Estate). This is an already converted audience!!

Chris Packham

at 15:05 on 25/09/2018 by Roger Bowker

There is nothing new in Chris Packham’s attitude, just the same deliberately bigoted nonsense. Question “Why does the BBC keep giving him a platform”or is the BBC as biased towards the rural ways as he is. So very grateful that we have the GWCT and it’s acknowledged integrity to flatten his type with.

Packham

at 14:38 on 25/09/2018 by Nigel Wroe

"A Peoples Manifesto for Wildlife THIS MANIFESTO . . . Was conceived to publish a set of informed ideas from a parliament of strong, independent voices. Ideas which, if implemented today, would make a huge difference for wildlife tomorrow." - Indeed, a "Parliament" of the self-appointed, the self-aggrandizing, the self-important, the self-regarding. But I don't see this as a people's manifesto. A bit of false advertising there. And whom might be the monarch of this talking shop? Chris Packham?

Packham the BBC sponsored ‘ wildlife expert’

at 14:06 on 25/09/2018 by Christopher Cannon

Packham is so blind to the good that gamekeepers do I am sure he has never had a conversation with any of them. As someone who has now given up shooting after a lifetime’s interest I have never come across a keeper who has not had respect for wildlife. They should be adopted and encouraged as countryside wardens by the conservationists not pilloried as they often are. Their understanding of the balance of nature is much better understood than the myopic Packham and his supporters. Locally we have had an infestation of red kites and the result is the absence of buzzards. Hedgehogs have all but disappeared and yet badgers are now everywhere. What chance do ground nesting birds have to reproduce successfully when there are foxes searching for food. The Corvid population has increased at the same rate as songbirds have declined. Until the Packmans of this world realise their views are so damaging our wildlife will continue to decline. In addition his supporters in the RSPB and the BBC should direct their fire at domestic cat owners not gamekeepers if they want to see and hear more songbirds.

Mr Packham

at 13:13 on 25/09/2018 by JOHN TINDLE

Excellent response.

Packham

at 12:33 on 25/09/2018 by DavidL

It really is a shame that Mr Packham who is supposed to be a scientist forgoes fact for his beliefs. I have been a member of the RSPB for over 50 years, the National Trust for 40 odd and the BASC for 20 years. Any one that goes onto shoot land can see hear and smell the countryside rather than the bland, tidy, sprayed and devoid of insects and songbirds that the British countryside has become over the last 50 years. Chris Packham should be ashamed that his beliefs and refusal to accept scientific evidence is actually killing the land that he says he wants to protect

Packhampropaganda

at 11:20 on 25/09/2018 by Paul

Great to see your proactive response to Mr Packham's propaganda war on shooting and grouse shooting in particular. Please keep up the good work.

Make a comment