Test other solutions to resolve Hen Harrier conflict: our letter published in The Independent

Past efforts to resolve the proven conflict between hen harriers and grouse moors, with diversionary feeding and legislation, have failed. Adam Lusher’s suggestion of making landowners legally liable for their employees’ actions is little better because they already are (With endangered hen harriers being illegally killed, is it time to even up the balance of power on grouse moors?).

The ten-year Langholm Moor study shows that we should test other solutions to resolve the conflict, such as actively managing harrier broods, to ensure they thrive alongside economic grouse moors. This is important for our harriers because, in the words of the RSPB, the “management of land for grouse shooting has protected upland areas from the worst of over-grazing and blanket conifer plantations whilst generating income for upland communities and forming a uniquely British form of cultural land use”.

Andrew Gilruth
Communications Director
Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust

Get The Moorland Balance for just £4.99 - Was £8.99

Based on the GWCT's submission to the Westminster debate on grouse shooting, this handy paperback book is a go-to guide for those with an interest in the British uplands and is based on years of research and practical experience, both from the Trust and other parties. Now available for just £4.99 - Limited copies available.

Buy now >


Make a comment

Cookie Policy

Our website uses cookies to provide you with a better online experience. If you continue to use our site without changing your browser settings, we'll assume you are happy to receive cookies. Please read our cookie policy for more information.

Do not show this message again