5/6/2020

RSPB “rigorously neutral” on pheasants? A blog by Sir Jim Paice, GWCT Chairman

Cock and two hens

By Sir Jim Paice, GWCT Chairman of Trustees

Anyone in a position to make decisions really wants to see both sides of an argument and make their own judgement. A genuinely neutral position but with evidence pointing one way is far more constructive than an entrenched position.

The last thing I wanted as a Minister in DEFRA was to simply think 'well they would say that wouldn't they'. Anyone with an axe to grind is easily dismissed. So, for those seeking to change opinion they should present all the evidence in a balanced way and let the facts speak. The final decision will be respected far more.

Those involved in game shooting were probably as surprised as me to hear the RSPB speaking on BBC Radio 4's More or Less here, focusing almost entirely on the negative views of pheasant releasing – despite explicitly stating that it’s ‘rigorously neutral’ on the matter here.

I doubt many in the sporting world were left feeling their side was fairly represented. There was certainly no doubt about which side this spokesman was on. A balanced answer would have explained that pheasant releasing is intrinsically linked with associated activities like planting and managing woodlands and providing wildlife habitat on farmland such as wild bird covers.

As with most land uses, pheasant releasing can have both positive and negative impacts on the countryside. Much of that evidence stems from scientific research conducted by the GWCT. Are we expecting too much to hope that it will be represented in a balanced way?

As you would expect, we use this work to produce guidelines that aim to maximise the benefits and minimise the negatives. They have been incorporated into the Code of Good Shooting Practice and adopted by a range of conservation organisations – because of the benefits to wildlife that stem from good game management.

Indeed, many current agri-environment scheme options including late winter supplementary feeding, wild bird cover and beetle banks have their roots in game management.

It’s hard to comprehend how the RSPB’s stated position of neutrality squares with what its staff are saying on the BBC.

Please donate to help us continue our vital work during this difficult time

Comments

RSPB , the BBC and pheasants

at 11:13 on 09/06/2020 by Paul White

Thank you Sir Jim Paice. As ever nothing is surprising about the BBC and the RSPB. Totally biased against anything to do with shooting. I am a member of a small syndicate releasing 1600 birds. We carry out lots of conservation work and besides 3 or 4 of us are involved with BTO and bird counts so how the RSPB and BBC are so anti is beyond comprehension. How much real conservation work do those two organisations carry out? When one considers that the BBC is urban based and the RSPB relies on it's income from mostly town based support who watch sanitised versions of wildlife programmes produced by the BBC it is not so surprising. I don't know what the answer is against bigotry.

Pheasant releasing

at 10:50 on 09/06/2020 by Burwood-Taylor Rhodri

Cannot Sir Jim complain personally to the head of the RSPB?

Make a comment

Cookie Policy

Our website uses cookies to provide you with a better online experience. If you continue to use our site without changing your browser settings, we'll assume you are happy to receive cookies. Please read our cookie policy for more information.

Do not show this message again