12/10/2020

It’s bizarre that staff at the RSPB decided to use a review process that accentuates the negatives and minimises the positives: Our letter sent to The Telegraph

Sir,

When it comes to researching the environmental impacts of game shooting, Britain leads the world. However, it’s bizarre that staff at the RSPB decided to use a review process that accentuates the negatives and minimises the positives in order to produce their doom-laden conclusions (News, October 12).

In contrast, a review published by Natural England just three months ago, did not show that large scale releases of pheasants are detrimental to the environment nor that they harm other bird populations - but rather they may boost them. It’s somewhat ironic that staff at the RSPB also chose to ignore the Natural England report’s central conclusion that the effects of pheasant releasing are complex and they must be carefully described to avoid misunderstandings.

 Andrew Gilruth, Director of Communications

Please donate to help us continue our vital work during this difficult time

Comments

Make a comment

Cookie Policy

Our website uses cookies to provide you with a better online experience. If you continue to use our site without changing your browser settings, we'll assume you are happy to receive cookies. Please read our cookie policy for more information.

Do not show this message again