1. Tinling, M.A., West, J.J., Cascio, W.E., et al. 2016. Repeating cardiopulmonary health effects in rural North Carolina population during a second large peat wildfire. Environmental Health, 15:1–12.
  2. Graham, A.M., Pope, R.J., Pringle, K.P., et al. 2020. Impact on air quality and health due to the Saddleworth Moor fire in northern England. Environmental Research Letters, 15:074018.
  3. Liu, X., Huey, L.G., Yokelson, R.J., et al. 2017. Airborne measurements of western U.S. wildfire emissions: Comparison with prescribed burning and air quality implications. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 122:6108–6129.
  4. Met Office. 2021. New studies highlight benefits of methane removal . Available at: (Accessed: 22nd October 2021)
  5. Lee, B.-K. 2010. Sources, Distribution and Toxicity of Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Particulate Matter. In: Air Pollution.
  6. Ramesh, A., Archibong, A.E., Hood, D.B., et al. 2011. Global Environmental Distribution and Human Health Effects of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Global contamination trends of persistent organic chemicals, 95–124.
  7. UK Parliament. Heather and Grass etc. Burning (England) Regulations 2021. 2021: Available at: (Accessed: 25th October 2021)
  8. GWCT. 2020. GWCT Peatland Report 2020: a review of the environmental impacts including carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas emissions and wildfire on peatland in England associated with grouse moor management. GWCT, Fordingbridge, UK.
  9. McMorrow, J.M., Lindley, S.J., Aylen, J., et al. 2008. Wildfire risk and climate change in the Peak District National Park. FIRES seminar series.
  10. Met Office. England and Wales Fire Severity Index. Available at: (Accessed: 25th October 2021)
  11. Uplands Management Group. 2019. Moorland Wildfire Task & Finish Group Report and Recommendations.
  12. Albertson, K., Aylen, J., Cavan, G., et al. 2009. Forecasting the outbreak of moorland wildfires in the English Peak District. Journal of Environmental Management, 90:2642–2651.
  13. Jassi, J., Everett, G., Dutton, A., et al. 2019. UK Natural Capital Mountains, Moorlands and Heath Ecosystem Accounts.
  14. del Carmen Redondo-Bermúdez, M., Gulenc, I.T., Cameron, R.W., et al. 2021. ‘Green barriers’ for air pollutant capture: Leaf micromorphology as a mechanism to explain plants capacity to capture particulate matter. Environmental Pollution, 288:117809.
  15. Wang, H., Maher, B.A., Ahmed, I.A., et al. 2019. Efficient Removal of Ultrafine Particles from Diesel Exhaust by Selected Tree Species: Implications for Roadside Planting for Improving the Quality of Urban Air. Environmental Science & Technology, 53:6906–6916.
  16. Trenbirth, H. and Dutton, A. 2020. Woodland natural capital accounts, UK: 2020 Office for National Statistics.
  17. UK National Ecosystem Assessment. 2011. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Technical Report. Chapter 5 – Mountains, Moorlands & Heaths.
  18. IUCN UK. 2016. Atmospheric pollution. IUCN UK Committee Peatland Programme Briefing Note Number 13
  19. Martin-Ortega, J., Allott, T.E.H., Glenk, K., et al. 2014. Valuing water quality improvements from peatland restoration: Evidence and challenges. Ecosystem Services, 9:34–43.
  20. Office for National Statistics. 2019. UK natural capital: peatlands.
  21. Allott, T., Auñón, J., Dunn, C., et al. 2019. Peatland Catchments and Natural Flood Management. IUCN UK Peatland Programme. 
  22. Stimson, A.G., Allott, T.E.H., Boult, S., et al. 2017. Water quality impacts of bare peat revegetation with lime and fertiliser application. Applied Geochemistry, 85:97–105.
  23. SEPA chemistry. 2020. Preliminary environmental assessment of Flubendazole use in Scotland for parasitic worm control in Moorland Grouse.
  24. Ashby, M.A. and Heinemeyer, A. 2021. A Critical Review of the IUCN UK Peatland Programme’s “Burning and Peatlands” Position Statement. Wetlands, 41:1–22.
  25. Labadz, J., Allott, T., Evans, M., et al. 2010. Peatland Hydrology. Review commissioned by the IUCN UK Peatlands Programme.
  26. Met Office Press Office. Climate change to bring heavier rainfall events. 2020: Available at: (Accessed: 26th October 2021)
  27. Fenner, N. and Freeman, C. 2011. Drought-induced carbon loss in peatlands. Nature Geoscience, 4:895–900.
  28. Li, P. 2014. Modelling blanket peat erosion under environmental change. PhD Thesis, University of Leeds. 
  29. Ritson, J.P., Bell, M., Brazier, R.E., et al. 2016. Managing peatland vegetation for drinking water treatment. Scientific Reports, 6:1–9.
  30. Heinemeyer, A., Vallack, H.W., Morton, P.A., et al. 2019. Restoration of heather-dominated blanket bog vegetation on grouse moors for  biodiversity, carbon storage, greenhouse gas emissions and water regulation: comparing burning to alternative  mowing and uncut management. Final Report to Defra on Project BD510. Stockholm Environment Institute at  the University of York, York, UK. Defra, York.
  31. Glaves, D.J., Morecroft, M., Fitzgibbon, C., et al. 2013. Natural England Review of Upland Evidence 2012 - The effects of managed burning on upland peatland biodiversity, carbon and water.
  32. Ashby, M. 2020. The effects of managed burning on upland peatland biodiversity, carbon and water. A review of the post-Glaves et al. (2013) evidence. Peatland Protection The Science: four key reports. The Uplands Partnership.
  33. Holden, J., Chapman, P.J., Palmer, S.M., et al. 2012. The impacts of prescribed moorland burning on water colour and dissolved organic carbon: A critical synthesis. Journal of Environmental Management, 101:92–103.
  34. UK – Office for National Statistics. 2021. Semi-natural habitat natural capital accounts, UK: 2021.
  35. Baines, D. and Richardson, M. 2013. Hen harriers on a Scottish grouse moor: Multiple factors predict breeding density and productivity. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50:1397–1405.
  36. Natural England and Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs. 2021. Another successful year for Hen Harrier breeding in England. GOV.UK: Available at: (Accessed: 26th October 2021)
  37. Ludwig, S.C., Roos, S., and Baines, D. 2020. Long-term changes in the abundance and breeding success of raptors and ravens in periods of varying management of a Scottish grouse moor. Avian Conservation & Ecology, 15:1–17.
  38. Thomson, S., McMorran, R., Scott, N., et al. 2020. Driven grouse moors - socioeconomic and biodiversity impacts: summary report.
  39. JNCC. Lesser black-backed gull (Larus fuscus). Available at: (Accessed: 26th October 2021)
  40. Natural England. 2019. European Site Conservation Objectives: supplementary advice on conserving and restoring site features. North Pennine Moors Special Protection Area (SPA). Natural England, York.
  41. Thirgood, S.J., Redpath, S.M., and Graham, I.M. 2003. What Determines the Foraging Distribution of Raptors on Heather Moorland? Oikos, 100:15–24.
  42. Newey, S., Fielding, D., Miller, D.G., et al. 2020. Biodiversity considerations on grouse moors. Part 4 of Research to assess socioeconomic and biodiversity impacts of driven grouse moors and to understand the rights of gamekeepers: Report to the Scottish Government.
  43. Fletcher, K., Aebischer, N.J., Baines, D., et al. 2010. Changes in breeding success and abundance of ground-nesting moorland birds in relation to the experimental deployment of legal predator control. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47:263–272.
  44. Massimino, D., Woodward, I.D., Hammond, M.J., et al. 2019. BirdTrends 2019: trends in numbers, breeding success and survival for UK breeding birds. BTO Research Report 722. BTO, Thetford.
  45. The RSPB. Twite Bird Conservation | Advice For Farmers. Available at: (Accessed: 26th October 2021)
  46. Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust. Black grouse. Available at: (Accessed: 26th October 2021)
  47. Derbyshire Mammal Group. Mountain Hare distribution. Available at: (Accessed: 26th October 2021)
  48. Buchanan, G.M., Grant, M.C., Sanderson, R.A., et al. 2006. The contribution of invertebrate taxa to moorland bird diets and the potential implications of land-use management. Ibis, 148:615–628.
  49. Eyre, M.D., Luff, M.L., and Woodward, J.C. 2003. Grouse moor management: habitat and conservation implications for invertebrates in southern Scotland. Journal of Insect Conservation, 7:21–32.
  50. Sanderson, R., Newton, S., and Selvidge, J. 2019. Effects of vegetation cutting on invertebrate communities of high conservation value Calluna upland peatlands. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 13:239-249
  51. Carroll, M.J. 2012. The ecology of British upland peatlands: climate change, drainage, keystone insects and breeding birds. PhD Thesis, University of York. 
  52. Driessen, M.M. and Kirkpatrick, J.B. 2017. The implications of succession after fire for the conservation management of moorland invertebrate assemblages. Journal of Insect Conservation, 21:15–37.
  53. Natural England. 2020. Burning as a tool for the restoration of upland blanket bog: Position Statement from Natural England (UPS01). Available at:
  54. Whitehead, S., Weald, H., and Baines, D. 2021. Post-burning responses by vegetation on blanket bog peatland sites on a Scottish grouse moor. Ecological Indicators, 123:107336.
  55. Newton, I. 2020. Uplands and birds. Harper Collins. London.
  56. Langholm Moor Demonstration Project. 2014. Langholm Moor Demonstration Project: Seven Year Review.
  57. Anderson, P. 2016. State of Nature in the Peak District.
  58. BRIG (ed. Ant Maddock). 2008. UK Biodiversity Action Plan Priority Habitat Descriptions. Upland heathland.
  59. JNCC. 2009. Common Standards Monitoring Guidance for Upland habitats.
  60. Davies, G.M., Kettridge, N., Stoof, C.R., et al. 2016. The role of fire in UK peatland and moorland management: the need for informed, unbiased debate. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 371:20150342.
  61. ADAS. 2019. Research to update the evidence base for indicators of climate-related risks and actions in England. Report to the Committee on Climate Change.
  62. Whitehead, S.C., Hesford, N., and Baines, D. 2018. Changes in the abundance of some ground-nesting birds on moorland in South West Scotland. Research Report to Scottish Land & Estates and Scottish Gamekeepers Association. GWCT, Fordingbridge.
  63. CLA CYMRU, FWAG CYMRU, and GWCT Wales. 2015. Final Report of the Berwyn, Migneint, Black Mountains & Radnor Upland Recovery Project.
  64. British Trust for Ornithology. 2017. Bird Trends Curlew. Available at: (Accessed: 27th October 2021)
  65. Ewing, S.R., Rebecca, G.W., Heavisides, A., et al. 2011. Breeding status of Merlins Falco columbarius in the UK in 2008. 2011.606497, 58:379–389.
  66. Porteus, T.A., Reynolds, J.C., and McAllister, M.K. 2019. Population dynamics of foxes during restricted-area culling in Britain: Advancing understanding through state-space modelling of culling records. PLOS ONE, 14:e0225201.
  67. Uplands Management Group. 2020. Blanket Bog Restoration Monitoring Task & Finish Group.
  68. Rodrigues, A.S.L., Monsarrat, S., Charpentier, A., et al. 2019. Unshifting the baseline: a framework for documenting historical population changes and assessing long-term anthropogenic impacts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 374:20190220.
  69. Bertrand, G., Ponçot, A., Pohl, B., et al. 2021. Statistical hydrology for evaluating peatland water table sensitivity to simple environmental variables and climate changes application to the mid-latitude/altitude Frasne peatland (Jura Mountains, France). Science of The Total Environment, 754:141931.
  70. Robroek, B.J.M., Jassey, V.E.J., Payne, R.J., et al. 2017. Taxonomic and functional turnover are decoupled in European peat bogs. Nature Communications, 8:1–9.
  71. Shuttleworth, E.L., Evans, M.G., Pilkington, M., et al. 2019. Restoration of blanket peat moorland delays stormflow from hillslopes and reduces peak discharge. Journal of Hydrology X, 2:100006.
  72. Gao, J., Holden, J., and Kirkby, M. 2017. Modelling impacts of agricultural practice on flood peaks in upland catchments: An application of the distributed TOPMODEL. Hydrological Processes, 31:4206–4216.
  73. The Uplands Partnership. 2020. Peatland Protection the science: Four Key Reports.
  74. Bacon, K.L., Baird, A.J., Blundell, A., et al. 2017. Questioning ten common assumptions about peatlands. Mires and Peat, 19:1–23.
  75. Atchley, A.L., Kinoshita, A.M., Lopez, S.R., et al. 2018. Simulating Surface and Subsurface Water Balance Changes Due to Burn Severity. Vadose Zone Journal, 17:1–13.
  76. Evans, C.D., Peacock, M., Baird, A.J., et al. 2021. Overriding water table control on managed peatland greenhouse gas emissions. Nature, 593:548–552.
  77. Allen, K.A., Harris, M.P.K., and Marrs, R.H. 2013. Matrix modelling of prescribed burning in Calluna vulgaris-dominated moorland: Short burning rotations minimize carbon loss at increased wildfire frequencies. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50:614–624.
  78. Glaves, D.J., Crowle, A.J.W., Bruemmer, C., et al. 2020. The causes and prevention of wildfire on heathlands and peatlands in England. Natural England Evidence Review NEER014. Natural England, York.
  79. Met Office. UK Climate Projections (UKCP) . Available at: (Accessed: 28th October 2021)
  80. Moffat, A.J., Morison, J.I.L., Nicoll, B., et al. 2012. Climate Change Risk Assessment for the Forestry Sector. (Defra Project Code GA0204). Defra, London.
  81. Gazzard, R., McMorrow, J., and Aylen, J. 2016. Wildfire policy and management in England: an evolving response from Fire and Rescue Services, forestry and cross-sector groups. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371:20150341.
  82. Wilkinson, S.L., Tekatch, A.M., Markle, C.E., et al. 2020. Shallow peat is most vulnerable to high peat burn severity during wildfire. Environmental Research Letters, 15:104032.
  83. Davies, G.M. 2006. Fire behaviour and impact on heather moorland. PhD Thesis. University of Edinburgh. 
  84. Grau-Andrés, R., Gray, A., Davies, G.M., et al. 2019. Burning increases post-fire carbon emissions in a heathland and a raised bog, but experimental manipulation of fire severity has no effect. Journal of Environmental Management, 233:321–328.
  85. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. 2019. Climate Change and UK Wildfire. POSTNOTE 603.
  86. Lecomte, X., Caldeira, M.C., Catry, F.X., et al. 2019. Ungulates mediate trade-offs between carbon storage and wildfire hazard in Mediterranean oak woodlands. Journal of Applied Ecology, 56:699–710.
  87. Davies, M.G., Gray, A., Hamilton, A., et al. 2008. The future of fire management in the British uplands. The International Journal of Biodiversity Science & Management, 4:127–147.
  88. Cairngorms National Park Authority. 2021. Cairngorms Views. Available at:
  89. Johnson, C.N., Prior, L.D., Archibald, S., et al. 2018. Can trophic rewilding reduce the impact of fire in a more flammable world? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373:
  90. Alday, J.G., Santana, V.M., Lee, H., et al. 2015. Above-ground biomass accumulation patterns in moorlands after prescribed burning and low-intensity grazing. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 17:388–396.
  91. Davies, G.M., Domènech, R., Gray, A., et al. 2016. Vegetation structure and fire weather influence variation in burn severity and fuel consumption during peatland wildfires. Biogeosciences, 13:389–398.
  92. University of York. Peatland-ES-UK. Available at: (Accessed: 28th October 2021)
  93. Moors for the future partnership. Reducing the risk of wildfire: wetter is better. Available at:
  94. Alnajdawi, R.A., Awak, V.E., Haliru, F.Z., et al. 2018. Carbon dioxide emissions of Saddleworth Moor fire.
  95. University of Manchester. Wildfire risk. Available at:
  96. Morton, P.A. 2016. A Burning Issue: Assessing the impact of alternative grouse moor managements on vegetation dynamics and carbon cycling on UK blanket bogs. PhD Thesis. University of York. 
  97. Gregg, R., Elias, J.L., Alonso, I., et al. 2021. Carbon storage and sequestration by habitat: a review of the evidence (second edition). Natural England Research Report NERR094. Natural England, York.
  98. Anderson, P. 1997. Fire damage on blanket mires. In: Blanket Mire Degradation. Causes, Consequences and Challenges: (eds. Tallis, J.H., Meade, R. & Hulme, P.D.) 
  99. Lihou, K., Rose Vineer, H., and Wall, R. 2020. Distribution and prevalence of ticks and tick-borne disease on sheep and cattle farms in Great Britain. Parasites & Vectors, 13:1–10.
  100. Forbes, A.B. 2020. Parasites of Cattle and Sheep: A Practical Guide to Their Biology and Control. CABI Publishing. 
  101. Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust. Red grouse. Available at: (Accessed: 28th October 2021)
  102. Porter, R., Norman, R., and Gilbert, L. 2011. Controlling tick-borne diseases through domestic animal management: A theoretical approach. Theoretical Ecology, 4:321–339.
  103. Gilbert, L., Brülisauer, F., Willoughby, K., et al. 2020. Identifying Environmental Risk Factors for Louping Ill Virus Seroprevalence in Sheep and the Potential to Inform Wildlife Management Policy. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 0:377.
  104. Cairns, V., Wallenhorst, C., Rietbrock, S., et al. 2019. Incidence of Lyme disease in the UK: a population-based cohort study. BMJ , 9:e025916.
  105. Denny, S., Latham-Green, T., and Hazenberg, R. 2021. Sustainable Driven Grouse Shooting? A summary of the evidence.
  106. Mac, S., da Silva, S.R., and Sander, B. 2019. The economic burden of Lyme disease and the cost-effectiveness of Lyme disease interventions: A scoping review. PLOS ONE, 14:e0210280.
  107. Joss, A.W.L., Davidson, M.M., Ho-Yen, D.O., et al. 2003. Lyme disease - what is the cost for Scotland? Public Health, 117:264–273.
  108. Health Protection Scotland. Lyme Disease. Available at: (Accessed: 29th October 2021)
  109. Newborn, D. and Baines, D. 2012. Enhanced control of sheep ticks in upland sheep flocks: Repercussions for red grouse co-hosts. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 26:63–69.
  110. Gray, A., Davies, G.M., Domènech, R., et al. 2021. Peatland Wildfire Severity and Post-fire Gaseous Carbon Fluxes. Ecosystems, 24:713–725.
  111. Friggens, N.L., Hester, A.J., Mitchell, R.J., et al. 2020. Tree planting in organic soils does not result in net carbon sequestration on decadal timescales. Global Change Biology, 26:5178–5188.
  112. Lees, K.J., Buxton, J., Boulton, C.A., et al. 2021. Using satellite data to assess management frequency and rate of regeneration on heather moorlands in England as a resilience indicator. Environmental Research Communications, 3:085003.
  113. Abdalla, M., Hastings, A., Truu, J., et al. 2016. Emissions of methane from northern peatlands: a review of management impacts and implications for future management options. Ecology and Evolution, 6:7080–7102.
  114. Vanselow-Algan, M., Schmidt, S.R., Greven, M., et al. 2015. High methane emissions dominated annual greenhouse gas balances 30 years after bog rewetting. Biogeosciences, 12:2809–2842.
  115. Evans, C., Artz, R., Moxley, J., et al. 2017. Implementation of an Emissions Inventory for UK Peatlands. A report to the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology.
  116. Natural England. 2020. Establishing a field-based evidence base for the impact of agri-environment options on soil carbon and climate change mitigation – phase 1. Defra, London.
  117. Holden, J., Palmer, S.M., Johnston, K., et al. 2015. Impact of prescribed burning on blanket peat hydrology. Water Resources Research, 51:6472–6484.
  118. Holden, J., Chapman, P.J., and Labadz, J.C. 2004. Artificial drainage of peatlands: hydrological and hydrochemical process and wetland restoration. Progress in Physical Geography, 28:95–123.
  119. Heinemeyer, A., Asena, Q., Burn, W.L., et al. 2018. Peatland carbon stocks and burn history: Blanket bog peat core evidence highlights charcoal impacts on peat physical properties and long-term carbon storage. Geo: Geography and Environment, 5:e00063.
  120. Harper, A.R., Doerr, S.H., Santin, C., et al. 2018. Prescribed fire and its impacts on ecosystem services in the UK. Science of The Total Environment, 624:691–703.
  121. Jones, M.W., Santín, C., van der Werf, G.R., et al. 2019. Global fire emissions buffered by the production of pyrogenic carbon. Nature Geoscience, 12:742–747.
  122. Flanagan, N.E., Wang, H., Winton, S., et al. 2020. Low-severity fire as a mechanism of organic matter protection in global peatlands: Thermal alteration slows decomposition. Global Change Biology, 26:3930–3946.
  123. Wu, B., Xi, B., He, X., et al. 2020. Methane Emission Reduction Enhanced by Hydrophobic Biochar-Modified Soil Cover. Processes, 8:162.
  124. Jeffery, S., Verheijen, F.G.A., Kammann, C., et al. 2016. Biochar effects on methane emissions from soils: A meta-analysis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 101:251–258.
  125. Palansooriya, K.N., Wong, J.T.F., Hashimoto, Y., et al. 2019. Response of microbial communities to biochar-amended soils: a critical review. Biochar, 1:3–22.
  126. Smith, P., Adams, J., Beerling, D.J., et al. 2019. Land-Management Options for Greenhouse Gas Removal and Their Impacts on Ecosystem Services and the Sustainable Development Goals. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 44:255–286.
  127. Ward, S.E., Ostle, N.J., Oakley, S., et al. 2012. Fire Accelerates Assimilation and Transfer of Photosynthetic Carbon from Plants to Soil Microbes in a Northern Peatland. Ecosystems, 15:1245–1257.
  128. Davidson, S.J., Van Beest, C., Petrone, R., et al. 2019. Wildfire overrides hydrological controls on boreal peatland methane emissions. Biogeosciences, 16:2651–2660.
  129. Ward, S.E., Ostle, N.J., Oakley, S., et al. 2013. Warming effects on greenhouse gas fluxes in peatlands are modulated by vegetation composition. Ecology Letters, 16:1285–1293.
  130. Heinemeyer, A. and Swindles, G.T. 2018. Unraveling past impacts of climate change and land management on historic peatland development using proxy-based reconstruction, monitoring data and process modeling. Global Change Biology, 24:4131–4142.
  131. Milner, A.M., Baird, A.J., Green, S.M., et al. 2021. A regime shift from erosion to carbon accumulation in a temperate northern peatland. Journal of Ecology, 109:125–138.
  132. Committee on Climate Change. 2020. Sixth Carbon Budget - Methodology Report.
  133. Farage, P., Ball, A., Mcgenity, T.J., et al. 2009. Burning management and carbon sequestration of upland heather moorland in the UK. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 47:351–361.
  134. Field, C.D., Evans, C.D., Dise, N.B., et al. 2017. Long-term nitrogen deposition increases heathland carbon sequestration. Science of The Total Environment, 592:426–435.
  135. Wei, X., Hayes, D.J., Fraver, S., et al. 2018. Global Pyrogenic Carbon Production During Recent Decades Has Created the Potential for a Large, Long-Term Sink of Atmospheric CO2. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 123:3682–3696.
  136. Shackley, S.J. and Sohi, S.P. 2010. An Assessment of the Benefits and Issues Associated with the Application of Biochar to Soil: A report commissioned by the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and Department of Energy and Climate Change. DECC. London, UK.
  137. Heinemeyer, A. and Ashby, M.A. 2021. An outline summary document of the current knowledge about prescribed vegetation burning impacts on ecosystem services compared to alternative mowing or no management.
  138. Young, D.M., Baird, A.J., Charman, D.J., et al. 2019. Misinterpreting carbon accumulation rates in records from near-surface peat. Scientific Reports, 9:1–8.
  139. Gallego-Sala, A. V., Charman, D.J., Brewer, S., et al. 2018. Latitudinal limits to the predicted increase of the peatland carbon sink with warming. Nature Climate Change, 8:907–913.
  140. Climate Change Committee. 2020. Sixth Carbon Budget.
  141. Harris, A. and Baird, A.J. 2019. Microtopographic drivers of vegetation patterning in blanket peatlands recovering from erosion. Ecosystems, 22:1035–1054.
  142. Ritson, J.P., Alderson, D.M., Robinson, C.H., et al. 2021. Towards a microbial process-based understanding of the resilience of peatland ecosystem service provisioning – A research agenda. Science of The Total Environment, 759:143467.
  143. Costanza, R. and Mageau, M. 1999. What is a healthy ecosystem? Aquatic Ecology, 33:105–115.